1952 Allard K2 vs. 1960 Citroen Bijou
To start off, 1960 Citroen Bijou is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard K2 (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1960 Citroen Bijou. (12 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard K2 should accelerate faster than 1960 Citroen Bijou. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K2 weights approximately 636 kg more than 1960 Citroen Bijou. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 Citroen Bijou, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K2 | 1960 Citroen Bijou | |
Make | Allard | Citroen |
Model | K2 | Bijou |
Year Released | 1952 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 424 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 12 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 564 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2380 mm |