1952 Allard K2 vs. 1960 Jaguar 3.8
To start off, 1960 Jaguar 3.8 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Jaguar 3.8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Jaguar 3.8 (217 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1960 Jaguar 3.8 should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Jaguar 3.8 weights approximately 248 kg more than 1952 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 1960 Jaguar 3.8 | |
| Make | Allard | Jaguar |
| Model | K2 | 3.8 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 3781 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1448 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2740 mm |
