1952 Allard K2 vs. 1960 Jaguar MK IX
To start off, 1960 Jaguar MK IX is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Jaguar MK IX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Jaguar MK IX (220 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1960 Jaguar MK IX should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Jaguar MK IX weights approximately 605 kg more than 1952 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 1960 Jaguar MK IX | |
| Make | Allard | Jaguar |
| Model | K2 | MK IX |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 3781 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 220 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1805 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 5000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2900 mm |
