1952 Allard K2 vs. 1961 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 1961 DAF Daffodil is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard K2 (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1961 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard K2 should accelerate faster than 1961 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K2 weights approximately 535 kg more than 1961 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 1961 DAF Daffodil | |
| Make | Allard | DAF |
| Model | K2 | Daffodil |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 26 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 665 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2060 mm |
