1952 Allard K2 vs. 1962 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1962 Cadillac 62 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 940 kg more than 1952 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 1962 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Allard | Cadillac |
| Model | K2 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 2140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 5650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3300 mm |
