1952 Allard K2 vs. 1963 Isuzu Bellett
To start off, 1963 Isuzu Bellett is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard K2 (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1963 Isuzu Bellett. (84 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard K2 should accelerate faster than 1963 Isuzu Bellett. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K2 weights approximately 280 kg more than 1963 Isuzu Bellett. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 1963 Isuzu Bellett | |
| Make | Allard | Isuzu |
| Model | K2 | Bellett |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1584 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 84 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 920 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2360 mm |
