1952 Allard K2 vs. 1964 Holden EH
To start off, 1964 Holden EH is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Holden EH (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Holden EH should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K2 weights approximately 15 kg more than 1964 Holden EH.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1964 Holden EH has automatic transmission and 1952 Allard K2 has manual transmission. 1952 Allard K2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1964 Holden EH will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K2 | 1964 Holden EH | |
Make | Allard | Holden |
Model | K2 | EH |
Year Released | 1952 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2929 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2680 mm |