1952 Allard K2 vs. 1964 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 1964 Sunbeam Tiger is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K2 weights approximately 60 kg more than 1964 Sunbeam Tiger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K2 | 1964 Sunbeam Tiger | |
Make | Allard | Sunbeam |
Model | K2 | Tiger |
Year Released | 1952 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 4261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2190 mm |