1952 Allard K2 vs. 1965 Chevrolet Corvette
To start off, 1965 Chevrolet Corvette is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 5,354 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Chevrolet Corvette is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Chevrolet Corvette (251 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Chevrolet Corvette should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Chevrolet Corvette weights approximately 276 kg more than 1952 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 1965 Chevrolet Corvette | |
| Make | Allard | Chevrolet |
| Model | K2 | Corvette |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 5354 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 251 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1476 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1270 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2500 mm |
