1952 Allard K2 vs. 1966 Chevrolet Caprice
To start off, 1966 Chevrolet Caprice is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 6,476 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Chevrolet Caprice (275 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 190 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Chevrolet Caprice should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Chevrolet Caprice weights approximately 470 kg more than 1952 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 1966 Chevrolet Caprice | |
| Make | Allard | Chevrolet |
| Model | K2 | Caprice |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 6476 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 275 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1670 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 5420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3030 mm |
