1952 Allard K2 vs. 1966 Fiat Campagnola
To start off, 1966 Fiat Campagnola is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard K2 (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1966 Fiat Campagnola. (62 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard K2 should accelerate faster than 1966 Fiat Campagnola. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Fiat Campagnola weights approximately 90 kg more than 1952 Allard K2.
Because 1966 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Allard K2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 1966 Fiat Campagnola | |
| Make | Allard | Fiat |
| Model | K2 | Campagnola |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1901 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2260 mm |
