1952 Allard K2 vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1966 Triumph 2000 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Triumph 2000 (91 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K2 weights approximately 30 kg more than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Allard | Triumph |
| Model | K2 | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 91 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2700 mm |
