1952 Allard K2 vs. 1967 Austin A 60
To start off, 1967 Austin A 60 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard K2 (85 HP) has 25 more horse power than 1967 Austin A 60. (60 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard K2 should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K2 weights approximately 80 kg more than 1967 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 1967 Austin A 60 | |
| Make | Allard | Austin |
| Model | K2 | A 60 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1622 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 60 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1120 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2550 mm |
