1952 Allard K2 vs. 1969 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1969 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K2 weights approximately 260 kg more than 1969 Mazda Cosmo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 1969 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Allard | Mazda |
| Model | K2 | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1962 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1170 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2210 mm |
