1952 Allard K2 vs. 1969 Mini MK III
To start off, 1969 Mini MK III is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard K2 (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1969 Mini MK III. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard K2 should accelerate faster than 1969 Mini MK III. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K2 weights approximately 555 kg more than 1969 Mini MK III. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Mini MK III, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 1969 Mini MK III | |
| Make | Allard | Mini |
| Model | K2 | MK III |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1274 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 645 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2040 mm |
