1952 Allard K2 vs. 1975 Volvo 240
To start off, 1975 Volvo 240 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard K2 (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1975 Volvo 240. (81 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard K2 should accelerate faster than 1975 Volvo 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Volvo 240 weights approximately 140 kg more than 1952 Allard K2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 1975 Volvo 240 | |
| Make | Allard | Volvo |
| Model | K2 | 240 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1986 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1340 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2650 mm |
