1952 Allard K2 vs. 1976 Mazda 616
To start off, 1976 Mazda 616 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard K2 (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1976 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard K2 should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K2 weights approximately 290 kg more than 1976 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 1976 Mazda 616 | |
| Make | Allard | Mazda |
| Model | K2 | 616 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1586 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2480 mm |
