1952 Allard K2 vs. 1977 Ford 2000
To start off, 1977 Ford 2000 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Ford 2000 (99 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1977 Ford 2000 should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Ford 2000 weights approximately 57 kg more than 1952 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K2 | 1977 Ford 2000 | |
Make | Allard | Ford |
Model | K2 | 2000 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1992 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1257 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2780 mm |