1952 Allard K2 vs. 1978 Chevrolet El Camino
To start off, 1978 Chevrolet El Camino is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. In terms of performance, 1978 Chevrolet El Camino (350 HP) has 265 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Chevrolet El Camino should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1978 Chevrolet El Camino has automatic transmission and 1952 Allard K2 has manual transmission. 1952 Allard K2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1978 Chevrolet El Camino will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 1978 Chevrolet El Camino | |
| Make | Allard | Chevrolet |
| Model | K2 | El Camino |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 350 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 5130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2980 mm |
