1952 Allard K2 vs. 1980 Alpine A 310
To start off, 1980 Alpine A 310 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Alpine A 310 (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Alpine A 310 should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K2 weights approximately 220 kg more than 1980 Alpine A 310.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K2 | 1980 Alpine A 310 | |
Make | Allard | Alpine |
Model | K2 | A 310 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1160 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2280 mm |