1952 Allard K2 vs. 1980 Audi 80
To start off, 1980 Audi 80 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard K2 (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1980 Audi 80. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard K2 should accelerate faster than 1980 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K2 weights approximately 220 kg more than 1980 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 1980 Audi 80 | |
| Make | Allard | Audi |
| Model | K2 | 80 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1587 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 980 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2550 mm |
