1952 Allard K2 vs. 1982 Buick Skyhawk
To start off, 1982 Buick Skyhawk is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Buick Skyhawk (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Buick Skyhawk should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K2 weights approximately 114 kg more than 1982 Buick Skyhawk.
Because 1952 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 1982 Buick Skyhawk | |
| Make | Allard | Buick |
| Model | K2 | Skyhawk |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1086 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2580 mm |
