1952 Allard K2 vs. 1982 Triumph Acclaim
To start off, 1982 Triumph Acclaim is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Triumph Acclaim (150 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Triumph Acclaim should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K2 weights approximately 384 kg more than 1982 Triumph Acclaim.
Because 1952 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Triumph Acclaim, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 1982 Triumph Acclaim | |
| Make | Allard | Triumph |
| Model | K2 | Acclaim |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2213 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 816 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2330 mm |
