1952 Allard K2 vs. 1983 Cadillac Eldorado
To start off, 1983 Cadillac Eldorado is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 4,080 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Cadillac Eldorado (133 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 490 kg more than 1952 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Eldorado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K2 | 1983 Cadillac Eldorado | |
Make | Allard | Cadillac |
Model | K2 | Eldorado |
Year Released | 1952 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 4080 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 133 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1690 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 5190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2900 mm |