1952 Allard K2 vs. 1984 BMW 316
To start off, 1984 BMW 316 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 BMW 316 (88 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 BMW 316 should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K2 weights approximately 210 kg more than 1984 BMW 316.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1984 BMW 316 has automatic transmission and 1952 Allard K2 has manual transmission. 1952 Allard K2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1984 BMW 316 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K2 | 1984 BMW 316 | |
Make | Allard | BMW |
Model | K2 | 316 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1767 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 88 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 990 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2580 mm |