1952 Allard K2 vs. 1984 Fiat Ritmo
To start off, 1984 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard K2 (85 HP) has 4 more horse power than 1984 Fiat Ritmo. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard K2 should accelerate faster than 1984 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K2 weights approximately 280 kg more than 1984 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 1984 Fiat Ritmo | |
| Make | Allard | Fiat |
| Model | K2 | Ritmo |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 81 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 920 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2460 mm |
