1952 Allard K2 vs. 1984 Holden Commodore
To start off, 1984 Holden Commodore is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 5,040 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Holden Commodore (169 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Holden Commodore weights approximately 180 kg more than 1952 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K2 | 1984 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Allard | Holden |
Model | K2 | Commodore |
Year Released | 1952 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 5040 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 169 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2680 mm |