1952 Allard K2 vs. 1985 Buick Century
To start off, 1985 Buick Century is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Buick Century (90 HP) has 5 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1985 Buick Century should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2.
Because 1952 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Buick Century, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1985 Buick Century has automatic transmission and 1952 Allard K2 has manual transmission. 1952 Allard K2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1985 Buick Century will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 1985 Buick Century | |
| Make | Allard | Buick |
| Model | K2 | Century |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1985 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 90 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4803 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1763 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1364 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2662 mm |
