1952 Allard K2 vs. 1988 Cadillac Cimarron
To start off, 1988 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1988 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K2 weights approximately 50 kg more than 1988 Cadillac Cimarron.
Because 1952 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K2 | 1988 Cadillac Cimarron | |
Make | Allard | Cadillac |
Model | K2 | Cimarron |
Year Released | 1952 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2842 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2580 mm |