1952 Allard K2 vs. 1988 Ford Telstar
To start off, 1988 Ford Telstar is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Ford Telstar (94 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1988 Ford Telstar should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K2 weights approximately 170 kg more than 1988 Ford Telstar.
Because 1952 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Ford Telstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K2 | 1988 Ford Telstar | |
Make | Allard | Ford |
Model | K2 | Telstar |
Year Released | 1952 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2520 mm |