1952 Allard K2 vs. 1989 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 5,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (238 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K2 | 1989 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Allard | Chevrolet |
Model | K2 | Camaro |
Year Released | 1952 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 5735 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 238 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2580 mm |