1952 Allard K2 vs. 1990 Fiat Tempra
To start off, 1990 Fiat Tempra is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 85 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K2 weights approximately 168 kg more than 1990 Fiat Tempra.
Because 1952 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Fiat Tempra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 1990 Fiat Tempra | |
| Make | Allard | Fiat |
| Model | K2 | Tempra |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1990 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1581 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1032 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2430 mm |
