1952 Allard K2 vs. 1990 Mitsubishi Magna
To start off, 1990 Mitsubishi Magna is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Mitsubishi Magna (114 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Mitsubishi Magna should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Mitsubishi Magna weights approximately 135 kg more than 1952 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Mitsubishi Magna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K2 | 1990 Mitsubishi Magna | |
Make | Allard | Mitsubishi |
Model | K2 | Magna |
Year Released | 1952 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2555 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1335 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2730 mm |