1952 Allard K2 vs. 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma (176 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma weights approximately 270 kg more than 1952 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
| Make | Allard | Mitsubishi |
| Model | K2 | Sigma |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1991 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2972 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 176 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2730 mm |
