1952 Allard K2 vs. 1992 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 1992 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Toyota 4Runner (112 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 402 kg more than 1952 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1992 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Allard K2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 1992 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Allard | Toyota |
| Model | K2 | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2366 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 112 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1602 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2630 mm |
