1952 Allard K2 vs. 1993 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 1993 Mazda RX-7 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Mazda RX-7 (238 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Mazda RX-7 weights approximately 110 kg more than 1952 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 1993 Mazda RX-7 | |
| Make | Allard | Mazda |
| Model | K2 | RX-7 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1993 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2616 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 238 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1310 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1240 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2430 mm |
