1952 Allard K2 vs. 1994 Chrysler ES
To start off, 1994 Chrysler ES is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Chrysler ES (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Chrysler ES should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K2 weights approximately 55 kg more than 1994 Chrysler ES.
Because 1952 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K2 | 1994 Chrysler ES | |
Make | Allard | Chrysler |
Model | K2 | ES |
Year Released | 1952 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2213 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1145 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2470 mm |