1952 Allard K2 vs. 1994 Mazda 626
To start off, 1994 Mazda 626 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mazda 626 (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Mazda 626 weights approximately 12 kg more than 1952 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K2 | 1994 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Allard | Mazda |
Model | K2 | 626 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1212 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2620 mm |