1952 Allard K2 vs. 1995 Chevrolet Astro
To start off, 1995 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Chevrolet Astro (183 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 696 kg more than 1952 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1995 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Allard K2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 1995 Chevrolet Astro | |
| Make | Allard | Chevrolet |
| Model | K2 | Astro |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 4293 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 183 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 8 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1896 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2830 mm |
