1952 Allard K2 vs. 1995 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 1995 Fiat Bravo is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Fiat Bravo (113 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Fiat Bravo should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K2 weights approximately 36 kg more than 1995 Fiat Bravo.
Because 1952 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 1995 Fiat Bravo | |
| Make | Allard | Fiat |
| Model | K2 | Bravo |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 113 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1164 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2430 mm |
