1952 Allard K2 vs. 1995 Mazda 121
To start off, 1995 Mazda 121 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard K2 (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1995 Mazda 121. (72 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard K2 should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda 121. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K2 weights approximately 380 kg more than 1995 Mazda 121. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mazda 121, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 1995 Mazda 121 | |
| Make | Allard | Mazda |
| Model | K2 | 121 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1322 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 72 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2460 mm |
