1952 Allard K2 vs. 1996 Audi RS2
To start off, 1996 Audi RS2 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Audi RS2 (311 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 226 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Audi RS2 should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Audi RS2 weights approximately 395 kg more than 1952 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 Audi RS2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Allard K2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi RS2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 1996 Audi RS2 | |
| Make | Allard | Audi |
| Model | K2 | RS2 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2226 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 311 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1595 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2600 mm |
