1952 Allard K2 vs. 1996 Chevrolet Lumina
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Lumina is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Lumina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Lumina (200 HP) has 115 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Lumina should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Lumina weights approximately 330 kg more than 1952 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Lumina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 1996 Chevrolet Lumina | |
| Make | Allard | Chevrolet |
| Model | K2 | Lumina |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 3789 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 200 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1530 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 5110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2740 mm |
