1952 Allard K2 vs. 1997 Acura EL
To start off, 1997 Acura EL is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Acura EL (127 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Acura EL should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K2 weights approximately 121 kg more than 1997 Acura EL.
Because 1952 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Acura EL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K2 | 1997 Acura EL | |
Make | Allard | Acura |
Model | K2 | EL |
Year Released | 1952 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 127 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1079 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4478 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1704 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1394 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2619 mm |