1952 Allard K2 vs. 1997 Mitsubishi Pajero
To start off, 1997 Mitsubishi Pajero is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Mitsubishi Pajero (182 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Mitsubishi Pajero should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mitsubishi Pajero weights approximately 640 kg more than 1952 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1997 Mitsubishi Pajero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Allard K2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K2 | 1997 Mitsubishi Pajero | |
Make | Allard | Mitsubishi |
Model | K2 | Pajero |
Year Released | 1952 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2972 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2430 mm |