1952 Allard K2 vs. 1999 Lexus RX
To start off, 1999 Lexus RX is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Lexus RX (220 HP) has 135 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Lexus RX should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Lexus RX weights approximately 1230 kg more than 1952 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1999 Lexus RX has automatic transmission and 1952 Allard K2 has manual transmission. 1952 Allard K2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Lexus RX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K2 | 1999 Lexus RX | |
Make | Allard | Lexus |
Model | K2 | RX |
Year Released | 1952 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 220 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 2430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2630 mm |