1952 Allard K2 vs. 1999 Mercury Tracer
To start off, 1999 Mercury Tracer is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mercury Tracer weights approximately 534 kg more than 1952 Allard K2.
Because 1952 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mercury Tracer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K2 | 1999 Mercury Tracer | |
Make | Allard | Mercury |
Model | K2 | Tracer |
Year Released | 1952 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1734 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2510 mm |