1952 Allard K2 vs. 1999 Mitsubishi GTO
To start off, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO (276 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 191 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2.
Because 1999 Mitsubishi GTO is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Allard K2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1999 Mitsubishi GTO has automatic transmission and 1952 Allard K2 has manual transmission. 1952 Allard K2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Mitsubishi GTO will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K2 | 1999 Mitsubishi GTO | |
Make | Allard | Mitsubishi |
Model | K2 | GTO |
Year Released | 1952 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2972 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2730 mm |