1952 Allard K2 vs. 1999 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 1999 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Nissan X-Trail (146 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 60 kg more than 1952 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1999 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Allard K2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K2 | 1999 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Allard | Nissan |
Model | K2 | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1952 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 146 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1260 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2630 mm |