1952 Allard K2 vs. 1999 Renault Clio
To start off, 1999 Renault Clio is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K2 weights approximately 265 kg more than 1999 Renault Clio.
Because 1952 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K2 | 1999 Renault Clio | |
Make | Allard | Renault |
Model | K2 | Clio |
Year Released | 1952 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 935 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2770 mm |